The down time statistics are based on individual fault reports. In Table 1 I give the general down time statistics for period 44.
A total of 130 fault reports were submitted, with an average time lost
of 8 min per fault, for a total down time of 0.9% (1.1% on scheduled
observing nights). Of these, 95 reported no time lost, 33 reported
2 hrs lost, and 2 reported 2 or more hrs lost.
This compares to a down time of 1.2% over all nights (1.3% on
scheduled observing nights) in period 43, and 0.5% over all nights
(0.6% on scheduled observing nights) in period 42. Of the 144 fault
report in period 43, 96 reported no time lost, 47 reported 2 hrs
lost, and one reported 2 or more hrs lost. Of the 85 fault reports
reported in period 42, 59 reported no time lost, 26 reported
2 hrs
lost, and none reported 2 or more hrs lost.
Night included | Time lost | Nights | Percentage![]() |
Last semester | Last Winter |
All nights | 1100 min | 183 | 0.9% | 1.2% | 0.5% |
Scheduled observing nights![]() |
1000 min | 138 | 1.1% | 1.3% | 0.6% |
Technical nights | 50 min | 22 | 0.3% | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Service nights![]() |
445 min | 39.5 | 1.7% | 1.5% | 1.1% |
Visitor instruments | 50 min | 23 | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
![]() |
|||||
are used when looking at ``All nights'' | |||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
The number of fault reports is still at a bit higher level than normal, mostly caused by things related to the introduction of the new detector controller for the ALFOSC CCD. Beyond that, the relatively high percentage of downtime is cause by a single large error (see below).